I used Lindley as an example to show that even Robinsons detractors feel he had done nothing wrong.he might have had access to footage not in the public realm.Why are you so against Tommy Robinson for speaking out about the despicable behaviour of some Muslim men.
As if the appeal to authority fallacies weren't silly enough, you're now you're resorting to pathetic straw man arguments.
Why is it people like you think that if agreeing with Robinson's position on the way Islam affects British society, or the topics about Pakistani rape gangs you therefore have to agree with everything else he says and does, defend him vehemently when he does stupid shit and attack anyone who criticises him? Is this world you live whereby you pick one side and have support everyone else there too not able to comprehend a middle ground?
And my problem with Robinson is that he's thick as shit boring attention-seeking provocateur masquerading as a "journalist" and thinks by having a microphone in his hand gives him a veneer of respectability. It doesn't. That and the fact he completely undermines any critical argument that exists regarding Islamism and the problems we have with Islam in the West. There's no doubt he does more harm than good.
I really wish he'd just fuck off for good and all his acolytes that follow his buffoonery would go follow someone like Douglas Murray, Hitchens or Sam Harris instead and read sensible, researched criticism of Islam, rather than Robinson's poorly-researched reactionary dogshit.
I am a great admirer of Christopher Hitchins and Richard Dawkins, you assume because I post on here in support of Tommy Robinson that is the extent of my knowledge. You post is inaccurate pretenious drivel.
