Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 28, 2018, 02:16:53 AM
Home Help Search Login Register

News: TPs Red Army...

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 02:16:49 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by SmogOnTour
Do you actually have anything to contribute to the topic instead of derailing it with your tedious shit flinging?

 2 
 on: Today at 02:12:24 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by coulbyboro.
Does your  (inaccurate ) verbosity makes you feel interlectual.

This is probably the most embarrassing Capio impression I've seen you do.
Your post before this is what starting to think you were him. Be better. (Irony).

 3 
 on: Today at 01:36:42 AM 
Started by Hairy Mouse - Last post by SmogOnTour
I got shot down in flames on here for saying his album was half decent.

The critics tend to agree with me too. It's a solid 'sing along' 60s vibe piece of work.



I certainly prefer his record to his brother's latest. Noel's has maybe two decent tracks on it and loads of awful filler.

Noel's first album was good but the last two I've totally discarded. 

I'll listen to "Fort Knox" and "The Man Who Built the Moon". I can't even remember anything fro his second release. Must have been bad.  souey

 4 
 on: Today at 01:34:41 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by SmogOnTour
Does your  (inaccurate ) verbosity makes you feel interlectual.

This is probably the most embarrassing Capio impression I've seen you do.

 5 
 on: Today at 01:33:47 AM 
Started by Hairy Mouse - Last post by Ben G
I got shot down in flames on here for saying his album was half decent.

The critics tend to agree with me too. It's a solid 'sing along' 60s vibe piece of work.



I certainly prefer his record to his brother's latest. Noel's has maybe two decent tracks on it and loads of awful filler.

Noel's first album was good but the last two I've totally discarded. 

 6 
 on: Today at 01:23:04 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by coulbyboro.
Does your  (inaccurate ) verbosity makes you feel interlectual.

 7 
 on: Today at 12:51:02 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by SmogOnTour
I used Lindley as an example to show that even Robinsons detractors  feel he had done nothing wrong.he might have had access to footage not in the public realm.Why are you so against Tommy Robinson for speaking out about the despicable behaviour of some Muslim men.

As if the appeal to authority fallacies weren't silly enough, you're now you're resorting to pathetic straw man arguments.
 
Why is it people like you think that if agreeing with Robinson's position on the way Islam affects British society, or the topics about Pakistani rape gangs you therefore have to agree with everything else he says and does, defend him vehemently when he does stupid shit and attack anyone who criticises him? Is this world you live whereby you pick one side and have support everyone else there too not able to comprehend a middle ground?

And my problem with Robinson is that he's thick as shit boring attention-seeking provocateur masquerading as a "journalist" and thinks by having a microphone in his hand gives him a veneer of respectability. It doesn't. That and the fact he completely undermines any critical argument that exists regarding Islamism and the problems we have with Islam in the West. There's no doubt he does more harm than good.

I really wish he'd just fuck off for good and all his acolytes that follow his buffoonery would go follow someone like Douglas Murray, Hitchens or Sam Harris instead and read sensible, researched criticism of Islam, rather than Robinson's poorly-researched reactionary dogshit.
I am a great admirer of Christopher Hitchins and Richard Dawkins, you assume because I post on here in support of Tommy Robinson  that is the extent of my  knowledge. You post is inaccurate pretenious drivel.

And your posts are pathetic, immature straw man arguments and other assorted stupid logical fallacies because you're incapable of addressing what people actually post, but have a desperate need to be part of a conversation, one that has seemingly flown right over your head. I notice you did exactly the same thing in the other Tommy Robinson thread too.

 8 
 on: Today at 12:49:55 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by Crocket
Some of them kids were 11 years old .

A bloke's lying in a cell miles away from his family for letting people know these trials are taking place in our courts .


 A bloke called Harvey Weinstein appeared in court that same day for multiple sexual offences

 Another bloke appeared in a court for simply talking about a sexual offence case with a phone camera.

 Guess which one went to jail that day.  


 Off to kip. Had enough of some of the sicko's on here  for one day.

 9 
 on: Today at 12:48:31 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by Len Inn
This accurately describes the kind of thing that's going on in the UK these days, and which the British media either refuses to report or is not allowed to report. I'm no great fan of Tommy Robinson myself, but this is scary stuff, and the Lefty Doyles are cheering it on. oleary
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12378/tommy-robinson-injustice

 10 
 on: Today at 12:43:12 AM 
Started by LEON TROTSKY - Last post by coulbyboro.
I used Lindley as an example to show that even Robinsons detractors  feel he had done nothing wrong.he might have had access to footage not in the public realm.Why are you so against Tommy Robinson for speaking out about the despicable behaviour of some Muslim men.

As if the appeal to authority fallacies weren't silly enough, you're now you're resorting to pathetic straw man arguments.
 
Why is it people like you think that if agreeing with Robinson's position on the way Islam affects British society, or the topics about Pakistani rape gangs you therefore have to agree with everything else he says and does, defend him vehemently when he does stupid shit and attack anyone who criticises him? Is this world you live whereby you pick one side and have support everyone else there too not able to comprehend a middle ground?

And my problem with Robinson is that he's thick as shit boring attention-seeking provocateur masquerading as a "journalist" and thinks by having a microphone in his hand gives him a veneer of respectability. It doesn't. That and the fact he completely undermines any critical argument that exists regarding Islamism and the problems we have with Islam in the West. There's no doubt he does more harm than good.

I really wish he'd just fuck off for good and all his acolytes that follow his buffoonery would go follow someone like Douglas Murray, Hitchens or Sam Harris instead and read sensible, researched criticism of Islam, rather than Robinson's poorly-researched reactionary dogshit.
I am a great admirer of Christopher Hitchins and Richard Dawkins, you assume because I post on here in support of Tommy Robinson  that is the extent of my  knowledge. You post is inaccurate pretenious drivel.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!